From: | Koichi Suzuki <koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: Make man on CentOS 5.6 |
Date: | 2011-08-19 00:41:26 |
Message-ID: | CAAn2te9jYS3H=bb+9s0vhcz0SC7H_LArq+Eo+FXzMtEUCeuZpQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Thanks a lot for the info. I visited the docbook page, got the
latest style sheet and it worked fine.
----------
Koichi Suzuki
2011/8/19 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> I wrote:
>> As far as I can tell, there is no "bold" template in the 1.69.1 files,
>> though I do see it in the 1.76.1 files. So this looks to me like we
>> have a minimum version dependency for docbook-style-xsl, and a
>> relatively recent one at that (1.69 is six or so years old).
>
> Some digging in the docbook release notes suggests that this probably
> changed in 1.73.0, which was released in July 2007:
>
> * Michael(tm) Smith: synop.xsl; block.xsl; info.xsl; inline.xsl; lists.xsl;
> endnotes.xsl;
>
> Changed handling of bold and italic/underline output in manpages
> output. Should be transparent to users, but...
>
> This touches handling of all bold and italic/underline output. The
> exact change is that the mode="bold" and mode="italic" utility
> templates were changed to named templates. (I think maybe I've
> changed it back and forth from mode to named before, so this is
> maybe re-reverting it yet again).
>
> I haven't actually tested whether we can build against 1.73.0, but that
> seems like a good place to start.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-08-23 07:39:22 | Mark recovery.conf as index term |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-08-18 20:17:18 | Re: Make man on CentOS 5.6 |