Re: cloning postgres-xc

Yes, this ML is not a right place to discuss this.

Could you raise this issue at postgres-xc-general ML?

Regards;
----------
Koichi Suzuki

2013/2/12 Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> This may not be the best place to ask these questions and you could
> have considered using postgres-xc-general mailing list from the
> Postgres-XC project site. Anyways, see my comments below.
>
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Zenaan Harkness <zen(at)freedbms(dot)net> wrote:
>> Does somone know the object overlap likely between pg and pgxc repositories?
>
> There is quite a lot overlap. Even though Postgres-XC has changed many
> files and added many other, there is still plenty of common code.
>
>> I ask because I could just git clone pgxc, or I could add a remote for
>> pgxc to my pg git clone, and make sure the branches are added, and
>> fetch that remote.
>> And in this way, common files/ objects are properly shared in one
>> repo, rather than duplicated.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> ISTM that's the right way, especially if you're interested in keeping
> PG code as well. This way, you will avoid a lot of duplicates and can
> also quickly do a "git diff" between files of these two projects. I
> find that very convenient at times.
>
> Thanks,
> Pavan
>
> --
> Pavan Deolasee
> http://www.linkedin.com/in/pavandeolasee
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general