Re: Rearchitecting for storage

From: Matthew Pounsett <matt(at)conundrum(dot)com>
To: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Rearchitecting for storage
Date: 2019-07-19 14:14:12
Message-ID: CAAiTEH-3PmV=-wHFf6JDxP+k6g7zNPSFAAPHBwUCAd9x6PGtyQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, 18 Jul 2019 at 21:59, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> wrote:

> >
>
> Now might be a good time to consider splitting the database onto multiple
> computers. Might be simpler with a mid-range database, then your plan for
> the future is "add more computers".
>

Hmm... yes. Range partitioning seems like a possible way forward. I
hadn't considered that yet. We might hold that back for when a dual-head
approach (server + jbod) can't scale anymore, but I think that's a long way
in the future.

>
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Pounsett 2019-07-19 14:41:31 Re: Rearchitecting for storage
Previous Message Matthew Pounsett 2019-07-19 14:08:45 Re: Rearchitecting for storage