Re: Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for PostgreSQL?

пн, 16 июл. 2018 г. в 14:26, <kpi6288(at)gmail(dot)com>:

> We – and the majority of our customers - are mainly focused on Windows. We
> use pgadmin iii and our own assistants. pgadmin iv ist still too slow on
> Windows compared to pgadmin iii. That is one reason why we still use
> PostgreSQL 9.6.
>
For performance reasons I mostly use the C++ language. Thus, I think the
performance
should not be a problem here.

>
>
> That said, one requirement on a commercial tool for us would be royalty
> free distribution to our customers. It should however provide the functions
> of pgadmin iii.
>
Do you need an administration tool or an assistant for database
development? I conceived Pgspa as a
development tool, which works with source files organized in the usual way.
For example, the sources
of the schema "foo" could be organized as:
foo/functions/*.sql
/views/*.sql
/triggers/*.sql
...
The developer works with files rather than objects retrieved from the
database and loaded
into the tree view of the GUI (like in pgAdmin and most of other similar
tools). Though, the
database browser GUI is a useful feature of course, and should be
implemented.

>
> Regards Klaus
>
>
>
>
>
> *Von:* Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com>
> *Gesendet:* Sonntag, 15. Juli 2018 18:59
> *An:* pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
> *Betreff:* Do we need yet another IDE (SQL development assistant) for
> PostgreSQL?
>
>
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> Colleagues. There is an idea to develop a commercial IDE for PostgreSQL
> under Windows.
>
> At the initial stage, not so much an IDE, as an assistant for the server
> side development.
>
> What features would you like to see in such an instrument? Thanks.
>