From: | Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | tahoe-gary <gbaker(at)salesforce(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: OID of type by name. |
Date: | 2013-04-05 08:45:10 |
Message-ID: | CAAfz9KODq5MpQSTLcdcvdkAE0PU117myHqDRgWayrhkpfqK7fQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
2013/3/29 tahoe-gary <gbaker(at)salesforce(dot)com>
> In what version of PG is the 'my_type'::regtype::oid syntax available? I
> want to introduce this to the JDBC driver which currently does the most
> ridiculous query that totally ignores search path.
>
> JDBC driver does this currently: SELECT oid FROM pg_catalog.pg_type WHERE
> typname = ?
>
> So if you have more than one type of the same name (or perhaps a UDT and a
> table with the same name as in my case) it just grabs whichever one first
> appears in pg_type regardless of search path.
>
> So I intend to change that query to: SELECT ?::regtype::oid
>
> But I need to know if I should be checking the server version or not. What
> is the min version that that query will work on?
>
According to the documentation, I think that Object Identifier Types was
introduced in 7.3.
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/7.3/static/datatype-oid.html
--
// Dmitriy.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Condor | 2013-04-05 09:54:14 | Re: Need advice to avoid ORDER BY |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2013-04-05 07:31:31 | Re: Oracle to PostgreSQL transition? |