From: | Dmitriy Igrishin <dmitigr(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PQconninfoParse() |
Date: | 2011-10-15 17:21:52 |
Message-ID: | CAAfz9KMtsyjGuqTKxWr7yUbtFsnvcCzAGsvzYSBjMhkBpDBNzg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
2011/10/15 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Maybe we should change this:
>
> > Note that only options explicitly specified in the string will have
> > values set in the result array; no defaults are inserted.
>
> > To say something like this:
>
> > All legal options will be present in the result array, but only those
> > explicitly specified in the string will have a corresponding value; no
> > defaults are inserted.
>
> Uh, is that actually a true statement? I thought the result *did*
> include default values. That's more or less the point of returning them
> all, after all.
>
Oops, indeed, if I understand your correctly thats what
I meant in my first post - "values of other options will have
NULL values" instead of "no defaults are inserted".
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
// Dmitriy.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2011-10-16 19:21:31 | Re: after failover? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-10-15 15:24:34 | Re: PQconninfoParse() |