From: | Harshitha S <hershetha(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Tracing in Postgres |
Date: | 2011-07-25 04:59:42 |
Message-ID: | CAAe0G5uv=1WC5y02ORCMGuv3A1xZuuNL57tk15JwAYaS5cZ+Yw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
I want to retain all the error messages, error report that is used by
Postgres.
I don't intend to log any information extra other than what is provided by
Postgres.
But I just want to replace the implementation of the logging/tracing in
Postgres, so that the existing messages can be redirected to a file, a USB
etc., There is an existing tracing frameworkfor this,I intend to use the API
s provided by this framework.
Regards,
Harshitha
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 5:00 AM, Harshitha S <hershetha(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > I am trying to integrate a tracing framework in the Postgres code.
> > I need to know if elog.c under backend/utils/error is the place where the
> > changes can be made.
>
> Depends on what your tracing framework is trying to do.
>
> > The tracing framework that I want to integrate has some additional
> > capability. I want to replace the tracing and logging functionality in
> the
> > existing Postgres framework with the APIs used in this framework without
> > making changes in every file.
> > If anybody has any inputs on this, please help me.
>
> If you just want to analyze the log messages, I would suggest letting
> PostgreSQL to write them out to files and then postprocessing the
> files. It will be less work. Also, there's a pretty limited amount
> of processing that is safe to do in elog.c. Some arbitrary part of
> the system has blown up, so you can't (just to take one example) read
> from the database at that point.
>
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joey Adams | 2011-07-25 05:05:39 | Re: Initial Review: JSON contrib modul was: Re: Another swing at JSON |
Previous Message | Tim | 2011-07-25 04:23:22 | Re: vacuumlo patch |