Re: Setting up streaming replication with new server as master?

From: Dave Johansen <davejohansen(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Keith <keith(at)keithf4(dot)com>
Cc: John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>, Shreeyansh Dba <shreeyansh2014(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Setting up streaming replication with new server as master?
Date: 2016-02-17 16:34:54
Message-ID: CAAcYxUdtpPSukwXLcrZqNS2=jGoq=J5=gYUQjNsC8TMuiw+JOw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Keith <keith(at)keithf4(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:02 AM, Dave Johansen <davejohansen(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 6, 2016 at 6:38 PM, John Scalia <jayknowsunix(at)gmail(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If you specify -X f or more likely -X s, that will cause pg_basebackup
>>> to include the WAL files that were written after you started the operation.
>>> Since you're setting up a replica, use the -X s option as that's for
>>> streaming.
>>>
>>
>> I ran pg_basebackup with -X s and it finished in the middle of the night
>> last night. I would now like to make the switch, but what's the best way to
>> copy over the records that have been inserted since the backup stopped?
>>
>
> The -Xs option just keeps the WAL files that were written during the
> backup run so that if you restore it, it's brought back up to a consistent
> state at the point when the backup itself finished.
>
> If you want to be able to bring up a slave from a backup at any point
> after that backup was complete, you have to keep all the WAL files that
> have been written since then. This is what is called Point-In-Time Recovery
> (PITR). I highly recommend you read up on the docs for how WAL files in
> postgres work and how to use them with backups and slaves. I think that is
> a key point your missing in understanding how to get a streaming slave set
> up and working.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/continuous-archiving.html
>

Ok, that was a misunderstanding on my part. I had understood that with the
-Xs option pg_basebackup would stay online and keep streaming the WAL files
until it was turned off. Thanks for the clarification, but on a related
note, that would be a really nice feature that would make doing this sort
of replication a lot easier.

I have run into another issue now though. I'm trying to start up the server
after running pg_basebackup and it keeps timing out. Do I have something
setup incorrectly? Or what is causing this issue?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Keith 2016-02-17 16:45:35 Re: Setting up streaming replication with new server as master?
Previous Message Andrea Suisani 2016-02-17 16:34:30 Re: oracle db reads from postgresql