| From: | Dave Johansen <davejohansen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Shaun Thomas <sthomas(at)optionshouse(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Unexpected pgbench result |
| Date: | 2013-12-20 15:40:35 |
| Message-ID: | CAAcYxUdmRRMssGHHEqwr5vqSV8PG_EZaH_0AvZt=aHHFSHbkfw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> wrote:
> Dave Johansen <davejohansen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Is there a benefit to having the WAL and logs on the separate
> > RAID 1? Or is just having them be part of the larger RAID 1+0
> > just as good?
>
> I once accidentally left the pg_xlog directory on the 40-spindle
> RAID with most of the data instead of moving it. Results with
> graph here:
>
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4B71358E020000250002F0E4@gw.wicourts.gov
>
That's very helpful information. Thanks for sharing it,
Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Johansen | 2013-12-20 15:52:51 | Re: Recommendations for partitioning? |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2013-12-20 15:22:10 | Re: Unexpected pgbench result |