Re: pgstattuple: add test for coverage

From: Dong Wook Lee <sh95119(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgstattuple: add test for coverage
Date: 2022-08-03 02:19:59
Message-ID: CAAcByaKiP_AZ=g7wCNazVzoVvDxkZDXm7Z+-ApxRCKVpn=Bq_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:

> I do not think it's a great idea to create random dependencies
> between modules like the pgstattuple -> bloom dependency you
> casually added here.
I agree with your option.

Is there no problem with selecting all the columns during SELECT statements?
I thought there might be a problem where the test results could change easily.

---
regards
Lee Dong Wook.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v2_add_test_pgstattuple.patch application/octet-stream 14.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2022-08-03 02:24:17 Re: Race between KeepFileRestoredFromArchive() and restartpoint
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2022-08-03 02:02:08 Re: collate not support Unicode Variation Selector