From: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: [DOC] Document concurrent index builds waiting on each other |
Date: | 2020-12-18 16:03:16 |
Message-ID: | CAAaqYe8qL9NQqEhCvMeppD+gBEQZwG8N4+qp=jzOZv8xuLHOJQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 8:05 PM James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2020 at 6:51 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> >
> > On 2020-Nov-30, James Coleman wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 4:53 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 2020-Sep-30, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > > > Yeah, I think it might be more sensible to document this in
> > > > maintenance.sgml, as part of the paragraph that discusses removing
> > > > tuples "to save space". But making it inline with the rest of the flow,
> > > > it seems to distract from higher-level considerations, so I suggest to
> > > > make it a footnote instead.
> > >
> > > I have mixed feelings about wholesale moving it; users aren't likely
> > > to read the vacuum doc when considering how running CIC might impact
> > > their system, though I do understand why it otherwise fits there.
> >
> > Makes sense. ISTM that if we want to have a cautionary blurb CIC docs,
> > it should go in REINDEX CONCURRENTLY as well.
>
> Agreed. Or, alternatively, a blurb something like "Please note how CIC
> interacts with VACUUM <link>...", and then the primary language in
> maintenance.sgml. That would have the benefit of maintaining the core
> language in only one place.
Any thoughts on this?
James
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2020-12-18 16:13:44 | Re: Proposed patch for key managment |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-12-18 16:02:56 | Re: how to use valgrind for TAP tests |