| From: | James Coleman <jtc331(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Shaun Thomas <shaun(dot)thomas(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort) |
| Date: | 2019-05-31 15:29:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAAaqYe-24xJBjaViEexpF1P9Y3MA__o2nWyyambqY=OoS3f3Yg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018-06-01 14:22:26, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
> I'd like to note, that I'm going to provide revised version of this patch
> to the next commitfest.
> After some conversations at PGCon regarding this patch, I got more
> confident that providing separate paths for incremental sorts is right.
> In the next revision of this patch, incremental sort paths would be
> provided in more cases.
Alexander,
I'm currently rebasing the patch, and if I get some time I'm going to
look into working on it.
Would you be able to provide a bit more detail on the changes you were
hoping to make after conversations you'd had with others? I'm hoping
for any pointers/context you have from those conversations as to what
you felt was necessary to get this change committed.
Thanks,
James Coleman
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Kellerer | 2019-05-31 15:39:50 | Re: Time range |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2019-05-31 14:45:26 | Re: Time range |