From: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Gsoc2012 Idea --- Social Network database schema |
Date: | 2012-03-20 01:36:54 |
Message-ID: | CAAZKuFYsQYZzR-Yh0PcL9bxx8J004S6gXEkRPmAOtofuEhGYEg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 6:17 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> On 3/18/12 8:11 PM, HuangQi wrote:
>> The implementation seems to be done quite fully. There is even a patch
>> file. Why is the implementation not added into the release of Postgres? As
>> so much has already being done, what could I do in this case for the Gsoc?
>
> That would be good for you to research. archives.postgresql.org will
> help you find the discussions around that.
I actually tried to find out, personally...not sure if I was searching
wrongly, but searching for TABLESAMPLE did not yield a cornucopia of
useful conversations at the right time in history (~2007), even when
the search is given a broad date-horizon (all), so I, too, an
uninformed as to the specific objections.
http://www.postgresql.org/search/?m=1&q=TABLESAMPLE&l=&d=-1&s=d
--
fdr
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-03-20 01:39:56 | Re: Command Triggers, patch v11 |
Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2012-03-20 01:20:16 | Re: sortsupport for text |