On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Maybe we should just not worry about this.
>
> That's been my reaction right along. There's no evidence that PID
> recycling is a problem in the real world.
I'm entirely willing to acquiesce to that point of view. I only
thought this was the blocker as to why pg_terminate_backend was left
out of the pg_cancel_backend patch.
In that thread, I have since posted the simpler "just let it happen" version.
--
fdr