| From: | Daniel Farina <daniel(at)heroku(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CLOG extension |
| Date: | 2012-05-03 21:28:17 |
| Message-ID: | CAAZKuFY1FGRMa+U-ga8qPKeXuN2EUe4paAL6cyBtUiAX+WqCcA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 2:26 PM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> I'm not sure I see the point in worrying about this at all. I mean, a
> process doing nothing does not waste much resources, does it? Other
> than keeping a PID that you can't use for other stuff.
Not much, but we do have an interest in very thinly sliced database clusters.
--
fdr
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-03 21:34:16 | Re: CLOG extension |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2012-05-03 21:26:08 | Re: CLOG extension |