Re: Combining two queries

From: Robert DiFalco <robert(dot)difalco(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David G Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Combining two queries
Date: 2014-12-18 22:02:42
Message-ID: CAAXGW-zsAyN9PEtoEojXgvqUWS+WWsGcaWmO0oDVv07KW2dffw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Is the intersect any better than what I originally showed? On the ROW
approach, I'm not sure where the context for that is coming from since it
may not be in the intersection. Consider n1 and n2 are NOT friends but they
have >0 mutual friends between them.

On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:29 PM, David G Johnston <
david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Robert DiFalco wrote
> > For 2 arbitrary ids, I need a query to get two pieced of data:
> > * Are the two users friends?
>
> This seems easy...ROW(u_id, f_id) = ROW(n1, n2)
>
>
> > * How many friends do the two users have in common.
>
> SELECT f_id FROM [...] WHERE u_id = n1
> INTERSECT
> SELECT f_id FROM [...] WHERE u_id = n2
>
> Put those into WITH/CTE and use the main query to combine them in whatever
> way seems appropriate.
>
> David J.
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://postgresql.nabble.com/Combining-two-queries-tp5831378p5831391.html
> Sent from the PostgreSQL - general mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Johnston 2014-12-18 22:07:48 Re: Combining two queries
Previous Message John McKown 2014-12-18 21:51:58 Re: Combining two queries