Re: UNION versus SUB SELECT

From: Robert DiFalco <robert(dot)difalco(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: UNION versus SUB SELECT
Date: 2013-11-21 23:13:56
Message-ID: CAAXGW-wsORadahGhttPZZeQiSgsu+Z3JAKEHncusyCE6NV5YwA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

No I didn't, thank you. I missed the parens.

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:58 PM, bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Robert DiFalco <robert(dot)difalco(at)gmail(dot)com>wrote:
>
>> Hmmmm...I'm not sure why the buffers option didn't work for me, maybe the
>> heroku psql is out of date.
>>
>
> Did you enclose it in brackets? Eg. "EXPLAIN (ANALYZE, BUFFERS) SELECT ..."
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rogerio Pereira 2013-11-22 12:06:19 Re: Query in cache
Previous Message bricklen 2013-11-21 22:59:42 Re: UNION versus SUB SELECT