| From: | Allan Nielsen <allan(dot)h(dot)nielsen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Inzamam Shafiq <inzamam(dot)shafiq(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patroni vs pgpool II |
| Date: | 2023-04-10 09:07:26 |
| Message-ID: | CAAX5PrYT1oePOc5FfaRoc0pVR1Y4hH=KCyvzN5MgtgK8r0jrcw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi
I have used pg_auto_failover for quite some time which provides automatic
failover with sync replication.
I did not have any issues yet and running around 30 clusters.
Regards Allan
man. 3. apr. 2023 kl. 08.33 skrev Inzamam Shafiq <inzamam(dot)shafiq(at)hotmail(dot)com
>:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Hope you are doing well.
>
> Can someone please suggest what is one (Patroni vs PGPool II) is best for
> achieving HA/Auto failover, Load balancing for DB servers. Along with this,
> can you please share the company/client names using these tools for large
> PG databases?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Regards,
>
> *Inzamam Shafiq*
>
--
Med venlig hilsen / With kind regards
Allan Nielsen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Karsten Hilbert | 2023-04-10 09:39:53 | Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: UPSERT in Postgres |
| Previous Message | Francisco Olarte | 2023-04-10 07:41:15 | Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: [EXTERNAL]: Re: UPSERT in Postgres |