From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, "sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net" <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, "rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com" <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Expose port->authn_id to extensions and triggers |
Date: | 2022-06-10 17:58:09 |
Message-ID: | CAAWbhmjPu2VNS8MhwDp=+hu61EsJ3zf_rTRtyZ8Qw08eAhg_pA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 9, 2022 at 6:23 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 7:53 PM Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
> > But I don't have any better ideas for how to achieve both. I'm fine
> > with your suggestion of ClientConnectionInfo, if that sounds good to
> > others; the doc comment can clarify why it differs from Port? Or add
> > one of the Shared-/Gang-/Group- prefixes to it, maybe?
>
> I don't like the prefixes, so I'd prefer explaining it in the struct comment.
Done that way in v11.
Thanks!
--Jacob
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
since-v10.diff.txt | text/plain | 11.4 KB |
v11-0002-Allow-parallel-workers-to-use-pg_session_authn_i.patch | text/x-patch | 14.2 KB |
v11-0001-Add-API-to-retrieve-authn_id-from-SQL.patch | text/x-patch | 5.9 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2022-06-10 18:34:13 | Removing "plpythonu" in PG 15 |
Previous Message | Jelte Fennema | 2022-06-10 16:31:26 | Support load balancing in libpq |