From: | Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Log details for client certificate failures |
Date: | 2022-07-08 18:39:04 |
Message-ID: | CAAWbhmgtVs0VciBwL4KbhQnLfTQKqwJjUUCxzA3SFECPn=ntTA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 2:50 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
> I looked into how you decode the serial number. I have found some code
> elsewhere that passed the result of X509_get_serialNumber() directly to
> ASN1_INTEGER_set(). But I guess a serial number of maximum length 20
> octets wouldn't fit into a 32-bit long. (There is
> ASN1_INTEGER_set_int64(), but that requires OpenSSL 1.1.0.) Does that
> match your understanding?
Yep. And the bit lengths of the serial numbers used in the test suite
are in the low 60s already. Many people will just randomize their
serial numbers, so I think BN_bn2dec() is the way to go.
> For the detail string, I think we could do something like:
>
> DETAIL: Failed certificate data (unverified): subject '%s', serial
> number %s, issuer '%s'
Done that way in v4.
I also added an optional 0002 that bubbles the error info up to the
final ereport(ERROR), using errdetail() and errhint(). I can squash it
into 0001 if you like it, or drop it if you don't. (This approach
could be adapted to the client, too.)
Thanks!
--Jacob
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
since-v3.diff.txt | text/plain | 4.5 KB |
v4-0001-Log-details-for-client-certificate-failures.patch | text/x-patch | 14.1 KB |
v4-0002-squash-Log-details-for-client-certificate-failure.patch | text/x-patch | 5.7 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ibrar Ahmed | 2022-07-08 18:41:34 | Re: Aggregate leads to superfluous projection from the scan |
Previous Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2022-07-08 18:18:58 | Re: Add last_vacuum_index_scans in pg_stat_all_tables |