Re: Schema version management

From: Joel Jacobson <joel(at)trustly(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Vik Reykja <vikreykja(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Schema version management
Date: 2012-07-08 12:45:48
Message-ID: CAASwCXcskqmHbRh7t4DgGjaY6rzVViKZ3rBYu9difqjm-aWsjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday, July 7, 2012, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> If we think that operators outside of extensions will be an infrequent
> special case, what about just dumping all of them into a single file
> named "operators"? And similarly for casts?
>
> regards, tom lane
>

+1

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-07-08 16:00:23 Re: expression evaluation with expected datatypes
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2012-07-08 07:13:09 expression evaluation with expected datatypes