Re: Standby is not removing restored WAL segments

From: Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com>
To: Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net>
Cc: bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standby is not removing restored WAL segments
Date: 2014-09-09 14:51:16
Message-ID: CAAS3tyLk2Oy9nkojS1EKitXwNQxbOB3nLbP3_EZOYb_kPbCZ-w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Jerry Sievers <gsievers19(at)comcast(dot)net> wrote:

> Or... Are your backups being taken using rsync or any non-pg_basebackup
> method *and* you are copying unnecessary WALs to the target new standby
> server, which then lay around forever as artifacts of not having been
> omitted initially?

That contradicts the fact that the files were removed after the restart.

--
Regards,
Alexey Klyukin

In response to

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shayra Sharma 2014-09-10 13:13:16 Postgres DBA/Denver, CO
Previous Message Eduardo Morras 2014-09-09 08:45:24 Re: Standby is not removing restored WAL segments