From: | Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Standby is not removing restored WAL segments |
Date: | 2014-09-08 14:18:57 |
Message-ID: | CAAS3ty+gey_FVPpa2Vq9SnJ7hn3TQv0erG6kpVA4ZF1aNMobPw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:52 AM, bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> We've got a 9.3.5 DB running in a standby mode for a fairly large DB
>> (500GB) with a busy WAL traffic (couple of GBs per hour) and it
>> occasionally 'forgets' to remove the segments it restored.
>
>
> A complete shot in the dark, but do you take backups from that server, and
> if so, does the backup script "pause" replication via
> "pg_xlog_replay_pause()"? If so, "select pg_is_xlog_replay_paused();" should
> return true, and executing "select pg_xlog_replay_resume()" will un-pause
> replication.
>
> Again, that's only a WAG.
>
Thanks. we do take DB backups from this server, but not from this
cluster on it, so it's not a backup interference.
--
Regards,
Alexey Klyukin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2014-09-08 16:05:48 | Re: Problems with PG 9.3 |
Previous Message | bricklen | 2014-09-08 01:52:28 | Re: Standby is not removing restored WAL segments |