Re: Standby is not removing restored WAL segments

From: Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com>
To: bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Standby is not removing restored WAL segments
Date: 2014-09-08 14:18:57
Message-ID: CAAS3ty+gey_FVPpa2Vq9SnJ7hn3TQv0erG6kpVA4ZF1aNMobPw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 3:52 AM, bricklen <bricklen(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 12:33 AM, Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)hintbits(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>> We've got a 9.3.5 DB running in a standby mode for a fairly large DB
>> (500GB) with a busy WAL traffic (couple of GBs per hour) and it
>> occasionally 'forgets' to remove the segments it restored.
>
>
> A complete shot in the dark, but do you take backups from that server, and
> if so, does the backup script "pause" replication via
> "pg_xlog_replay_pause()"? If so, "select pg_is_xlog_replay_paused();" should
> return true, and executing "select pg_xlog_replay_resume()" will un-pause
> replication.

>
> Again, that's only a WAG.
>

Thanks. we do take DB backups from this server, but not from this
cluster on it, so it's not a backup interference.

--
Regards,
Alexey Klyukin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2014-09-08 16:05:48 Re: Problems with PG 9.3
Previous Message bricklen 2014-09-08 01:52:28 Re: Standby is not removing restored WAL segments