From: | Anthony DeBarros <adebarros(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dmitry Voronin <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru> |
Cc: | pgadmin-support <pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgadmin3 some fixes |
Date: | 2016-10-28 12:32:48 |
Message-ID: | CAAQFaFLdXJ1hkgfOO+EPu3FWiZ=jTvA4zKtM6w7u=murRgrdFQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgadmin-support |
While pgAdmin 4 will naturally continue to improve, it is fully
understandable that people want to keep pgAdmin3 alive and are willing to
do the work. That's the beauty of open source. However, I'm wondering
whether it would make sense for the community to agree on maintaining one
fork of the project so that various improvements all end up in the same
place?
For example, yesterday BigSQL announced its own fork of pgAdmin3:
https://www.bigsql.org/pgadmin3/
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Dmitry Voronin <carriingfate92(at)yandex(dot)ru>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some reasons we need to use pgadmin3 in our work. I will make some
> fixes of pgadmin3 origin code to make it useable with new PostgreSQL
> versions.
>
> My fork located at: https://github.com/dimv36/pgadmin3.
>
> Today pgadmin3 can:
>
> - Create or edit policies
> - Enable/Disable RLS on tables.
> - Full translation for ru locale.
>
> Your pull requests or additions are welcome!
>
> --
> Best regards, Dmitry Voronin
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgadmin-support mailing list (pgadmin-support(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgadmin-support
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mark Csaba | 2016-10-28 12:37:41 | Re: pgAdmin 4.1.1 cannot run on win7 |
Previous Message | André Cardoso | 2016-10-28 10:46:18 | Re: pgAdmin 4.1.1 cannot run on win7 |