From: | Jan Mußler <jan(dot)mussler(at)zalando(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #16594: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY fails on partitioned table with a non helpful error message. |
Date: | 2020-08-27 19:51:10 |
Message-ID: | CAAP012m2gqr1pa_0v0GFBeyn_+g2wLLubwwZT6y41CYViXm3zg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Alvaro,
thank you for looking into this on short notice. Looks better now with an
error messaging hinting at the problem.
-- Jan
Am Do., 27. Aug. 2020 um 21:22 Uhr schrieb Alvaro Herrera <
alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>:
> On 2020-Aug-27, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > On 2020-Aug-27, Michael Paquier wrote:
> >
> > > The error message is really confusing though, so for now I would
> > > recommend to just drop an error if trying the operation on a
> > > partitioned table, and we also do that now for CREATE INDEX
> > > CONCURRENTLY.
> >
> > Yeah, let's throw an error if the table is partitioned. My bug -- I'll
> > go fix it now.
>
> ... as attached.
>
> I first tried to add a hack directly in index_drop, but that doesn't
> really work because there's no way to tell whether the partitioned index
> is going to be dropped first or the index partition -- as that code runs
> after the dependency tree has been walked. The condition has to be
> checked before starting the object-drop code proper.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jesse Kinkead | 2020-08-27 20:19:45 | Re: BUG #16595: Reads fail with "lost saved point in index" error after writes |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2020-08-27 19:22:18 | Re: BUG #16594: DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY fails on partitioned table with a non helpful error message. |