From: | Poul Kristensen <bcc5226(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgresSQL 9.5 and systemd autorestart but without replication. |
Date: | 2016-10-26 21:23:38 |
Message-ID: | CAAOuvVq1fS8e1Hg0sRuUPXahBA+m15v-0srwg+waY-M0toYt6A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Yes.
And a library as the one on the master have to established on the standby
server in order to continue WAL archives on
standby.
As far as I remember I experienced the same situation using the
"hot_standby" option in the "standby server" section(together with at
riggerfile).
There is no solution that makes automatic switching between replication
nodes ensuring no dataloss even not a glusterfs just by itself.
A third replicated server has to be added. PostgreSQL - in my opion - ought
be able to meet network interruptions as they
seem to quite common making nodes switch several times each day. As one of
you kind people said: To be sure against dataloss
use a cluster(at least 2 servers) plus a replication server.
Thanks a lot for helping.
Poul
2016-10-26 17:49 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Poul Kristensen <bcc5226(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > No, it is turned off.
> > Nothing in the "standby section" in postgresql.conf is turned on.
>
> Then it's behaving as expected for a cold standby server, I think.
> It's going to stay in this state until told to promote.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Poul Kristensen
Linux-OS/Virtualizationexpert and Oracle DBA
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Natalie Wenz | 2016-10-26 22:12:59 | Re: pg_toast oid limits |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2016-10-26 19:25:29 | Re: pg_toast oid limits |