From: | Poul Kristensen <bcc5226(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Scott Mead <scottm(at)openscg(dot)com>, pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgresSQL 9.5 and systemd autorestart but without replication. |
Date: | 2016-10-26 13:36:40 |
Message-ID: | CAAOuvVoMpaXNm32n=3QHG2vdmMfCMpeWFx=YzCJF8bAu_h1VLw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
It IS the standby server:
Result of pg_isready:
/usr/pgsql-9.6/bin/pg_isready -h /tmp -p 5432
/tmp:5432 - rejecting connections
In the pg_log:
2016-10-26 13:30:16.298 UTC > FATAL: the database system is starting up
Thanks
Poul
2016-10-26 15:10 GMT+02:00 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> Poul Kristensen <bcc5226(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Replica(hot_standby) server:
> > Is it normal behavior that PostgreSQL 9.6 does a very very slow
> > recovery restart point at 1/77472E5 in the pg_log
> > while doing this
> > postgres: startup process recovering 000000010000000100000077(this
> > process has run several days)
>
> If that's the standby server, that process will persist as long as it's in
> standby; it's what's responsible for applying WAL received by the
> walreceiver process. You should have been able to connect long before
> now, though.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
--
Med venlig hilsen / Best regards
Poul Kristensen
Linux-OS/Virtualizationexpert and Oracle DBA
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-10-26 13:39:23 | Re: PostgresSQL 9.5 and systemd autorestart but without replication. |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2016-10-26 13:30:56 | Re: Using pg hotbackup directly without wal archives |