From: | David Schnur <dnschnur(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Repeatable crash in pg_dump (with -d2 info) |
Date: | 2011-11-23 16:03:28 |
Message-ID: | CAANiQEm92w70rapQhitV1qL0tpkNRo5qjpwo2fdg+iZ-AURMCg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-bugs |
I'm seeing pg_dump [8.3.15 Windows] crash reproducibly against a particular
database. Searching the web, I found [
http://grokbase.com/t/postgresql.org/pgsql-general/2001/02/pg-dump-crash/06ss55h5l35jh4bnnqfigxisy534]
with
a response from Tom Lane suggesting that it was probably due to a bug in
pg_dump related to dumping functions.
That post was made more than 10 years ago, but I figured it was worth a
try, and set my pg_dump to run with PGOPTIONS="-d2". Sure enough, the
crash is preceded by the following lines:
SELECT proretset, prosrc, probin, proallargtypes, proargmodes, proargnames,
provolatile, proisstrict, prosecdef, proconfig, procost, prorows, (SELECT
lanname FROM pg_catalog.pg_language WHERE oid = prolang) as lanname FROM
pg_catalog.pg_proc WHERE oid = '16730'::pg_catalog.oid
SELECT pg_catalog.format_type('1185'::pg_catalog.oid, NULL)
SELECT pg_catalog.format_type('1022'::pg_catalog.oid, NULL)
SELECT pg_catalog.format_type('1184'::pg_catalog.oid, NULL)
SELECT pg_catalog.format_type('701'::pg_catalog.oid, NULL)
SELECT pg_catalog.format_type('1185'::pg_catalog.oid, NULL)
SELECT pg_catalog.format_type('1022'::pg_catalog.oid, NULL)
SELECT pg_catalog.format_type('2249'::pg_catalog.oid, NULL)
The OIDs 1185, 1022, 1184 and 701 are present in proallargtypes, so pg_dump
appears to be looking up argument types for that function. I couldn't see
2249 anywhere, though, so I ran this:
SELECT * FROM pg_catalog.pg_proc WHERE oid = '16730'
And 2249 showed up in prorettype. The result from that last query is
'record', since the function RETURNS SETOF RECORD.
That original post turned out to be some temporary trigger function that
the user simply deleted to solve the problem. This function, however, is
legitimate, and I can't simply delete it. Does anyone know what might be
happening here, and how to work around it? Thanks!
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-23 17:05:03 | Re: Repeatable crash in pg_dump (with -d2 info) |
Previous Message | Ian Lea | 2011-11-23 15:51:17 | Re: Point in time recovery |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-23 17:05:03 | Re: Repeatable crash in pg_dump (with -d2 info) |
Previous Message | Andrea Suisani | 2011-11-23 14:58:28 | Re: BUG #6303: ROW_NUMBER() |