| From: | James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)jirotech(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached |
| Date: | 2021-12-06 05:47:37 |
| Message-ID: | CAANVwEtYQe4k0T9mGtO2SEcLvHEF8BEE2B29A+EeNEQ35NM=Pw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
+1, I too like the idea. The patch doesn't seem to be doing any heavy
> lifting, I think that much overhead should be acceptable.
>
I'm guessing this won't be back-patched? Is it possible to somehow read
this information from a C function?
- James
--
The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or
professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this
email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this
communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or
otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your
incorrect receipt of this correspondence.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Daniel Frey | 2021-12-06 10:08:28 | Re: libpq: Which functions may hang due to network issues? |
| Previous Message | Kyotaro Horiguchi | 2021-12-06 05:03:10 | Re: ssl_crl_file Certificate Revocation List doesn't work for postgresql 11 |