Re: Mismatch of relation names: pg_toast.pg_toast_nnn during pg_upgrade from 8.4 to 9.1

I regret that as a part-timer recently brought back on here I didn't
get an opportunity to test this earlier. The upgrade with the patch
worked fine on my first attempt.

Thanks again,

Jamie

On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 7:32 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Jamie Fox wrote:
>> Thanks, I'm following the thread "pg_upgrade automatic testing" and
>> will try the patch just detailed there.
>
> I have applied the patch to head and 9.1.X.  We still have a win32 bug
> to fix.  It is a shame I was not able to fix these before 9.1.1 was
> released.  :-(
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> > On tis, 2011-09-27 at 16:19 -0700, Jamie Fox wrote:
>> >>
>> >> It fails at this stage:
>> >>
>> >> ? ? Restoring user relation files
>> >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2613 to
>> >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12570
>> >> ? ? linking /data/pgsql/prod-84/base/11564/2683 to
>> >> /data/pgsql/prod-91/base/12698/12572
>> >> ? ? Mismatch of relation names: database "prod1", old rel
>> >> pg_toast.pg_toast_54542379, new rel pg_toast.pg_toast_16735
>> >> ? ? Failure, exiting
>> >
>> > This issue is known and a fix is currently being discussed.
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
> --
>  Bruce Momjian  <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>        http://momjian.us
>  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
>
>  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +
>