From: | Soni M <diptatapa(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Moreno Andreo <moreno(dot)andreo(at)evolu-s(dot)it> |
Cc: | "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [SPAM] OS cache management |
Date: | 2017-09-10 05:49:41 |
Message-ID: | CAAMgDXnvp6VvU6ZVBZwvrhub-C3nF6tbriiGjtj6W5a+C_19Yg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Yeah, thanks. We have it in count.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 9:45 PM, Moreno Andreo <moreno(dot)andreo(at)evolu-s(dot)it>
wrote:
> Il 06/09/2017 10:12, Soni M ha scritto:
>
>>
>>
>> Let's say I have 10 year data, and commonly used data only the last 1
>> year. This data is quite big, so each table and index file is divided into
>> several file in PGDATA/base
>>
>> May not be relevant to what you asked, but if you want to keep last yeat
> data in a "small and fast" dataset separated (physically separated!) by old
> data (that's still available, but response times may vary), IMHO you should
> consider partitioning...
> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/ddl-partitioning.html
>
> HTH,
> Moreno.-
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
>
--
Regards,
Soni Maula Harriz
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Mariel Cherkassky | 2017-09-11 09:42:01 | postgresql 9.6 data directory fs becomes full |
Previous Message | Soni M | 2017-09-10 05:48:23 | Re: OS cache management |