Re: slow server : s_lock and _bt_checkkeys on perf top

From: Soni M <diptatapa(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: slow server : s_lock and _bt_checkkeys on perf top
Date: 2015-03-06 16:04:09
Message-ID: CAAMgDXmLTdjre+U7HwpjnBhp5gWOrDzbJnFtfdU7dXiTZaBt9Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Thanks All for the response, finally we figure it out. The slow is due to
high number of dead rows on main table, repack these tables wipe out the
issue.
On Mar 6, 2015 9:31 PM, "Merlin Moncure" <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Soni M <diptatapa(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > Master db size 1.5 TB
> > All postgres 9.1.13 installed from RHEL package.
> > It has streaming replica and slony replica to another servers.
> >
> > Server performance is slower than usual, before that, there's a big query
> > got cancelled and then performance get slow.
> >
> > No sign of IO wait.
> >
> > on sar, it's %user and %system dominate the cpu usage
> > 01:25:04 PM CPU %user %nice %system %iowait %steal
> > %idle
> > Average: all 51.91 0.00 12.03 0.66 0.00
> > 35.39
> >
> > on perf top, i saw
> > 18.93% postgres [.] s_lock
> > 10.72% postgres [.] _bt_checkkeys
> > almost always at top.
> >
> > I don't have any idea, what's causing it or how to resolve it ?
>
> Can you post the entire 'perf top'? do you see (specifically I'm
> wondering if you are bumping against the RecoveryInProgress s_lock
> issue). If so, upgrading postgres might be the best way to resolve
> the issue.
>
> merlin
>

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2015-03-06 17:18:49 Re: EXPLAIN (no ANALYZE) taking an hour for INSERT FROM SELECT
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2015-03-06 14:31:14 Re: slow server : s_lock and _bt_checkkeys on perf top