| From: | Miles Elam <miles(dot)elam(at)productops(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Lev Kokotov <lev(dot)kokotov(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PG-General Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: DDL support for logical replication |
| Date: | 2019-10-10 19:49:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAALojA_eLfiCkVCesr1gnBbWsGLqNVe9kLD1Y1uxHGONw=PLfw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi Lev,
While I don't have an answer to your roadmap question, you've raised a
different question for me.
What are you expecting to get from logical replication of DDL commands that
is not served by binary replication? I ask because typically someone would
want to use logical replication if they wanted triggers to fire on the
subscriber, they only a subset of all tables replicated, etc.
Perhaps a better question would be "What problem are you trying to solve?"
rather than focus on how you expected to solve that problem.
Cheers,
Miles Elam
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 11:08 AM Lev Kokotov <lev(dot)kokotov(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is DDL support on a roadmap for logical replication?
>
> Thank you.
> - Lev
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Yessica Brinkmann | 2019-10-10 19:56:10 | Re: The connection to the server was lost. Attempting reset: Failed. |
| Previous Message | pascal.crozet | 2019-10-10 19:47:23 | Re: plpgsql copy import csv double quotes |