Re: Using read stream in autoprewarm

On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 12:27 PM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I worked on an alternative approach, I refactored code a bit. It does
> not traverse the list two times and I think the code is more suitable
> to use read streams now. I simply get how many blocks are processed by
> read streams and move the list forward by this number, so the actual
> loop skips these blocks. This approach is attached with 'alternative'
> prefix.

I am leaning toward the refactored approach because I don't think we
want to go through the array twice and I think it is hard to get it
right with incrementing p.pos in both places and being sure we
correctly close the relation etc.

Looking at your alternative approach, I don't see how the innermost
while loop in autoprewarm_database_main() is correct

/* Check whether blocknum is valid and within fork file size. */
while (cur_filenumber == blk->filenumber &&
blk->blocknum >= nblocks_in_fork)
{
/* Move to next forknum. */
pos++;
continue;
}

Won't this just infinitely loop?

- Melanie