From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM |
Date: | 2023-03-07 17:39:29 |
Message-ID: | CAAKRu_amaA3gDUwsKtipWY_ShGSy_O3D8hwN8aT98LcBVK+yHQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 10:45 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 04:59:49PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > That did cross my mind, but I was worried that trying to explain all that
> > here could cause confusion.
> >
> > If PROCESS_MAIN is set (the default), it's time to vacuum the main
> > relation. Otherwise, we can skip this part. If processing the TOAST
> > table is required (e.g., PROCESS_TOAST is set), we'll force
> > PROCESS_MAIN to be set when we recurse to the TOAST table so that it
> > gets processed here.
> >
> > How does that sound?
>
> Sounds clear to me, thanks! Melanie, what do you think?
Yes, sounds clear to me also!
- Melanie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-03-07 17:39:34 | Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames |
Previous Message | Sébastien Lardière | 2023-03-07 17:14:58 | Re: Timeline ID hexadecimal format |