Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: add PROCESS_MAIN to VACUUM
Date: 2023-03-07 17:39:29
Message-ID: CAAKRu_amaA3gDUwsKtipWY_ShGSy_O3D8hwN8aT98LcBVK+yHQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Mar 6, 2023 at 10:45 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 06, 2023 at 04:59:49PM -0800, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > That did cross my mind, but I was worried that trying to explain all that
> > here could cause confusion.
> >
> > If PROCESS_MAIN is set (the default), it's time to vacuum the main
> > relation. Otherwise, we can skip this part. If processing the TOAST
> > table is required (e.g., PROCESS_TOAST is set), we'll force
> > PROCESS_MAIN to be set when we recurse to the TOAST table so that it
> > gets processed here.
> >
> > How does that sound?
>
> Sounds clear to me, thanks! Melanie, what do you think?

Yes, sounds clear to me also!

- Melanie

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-03-07 17:39:34 Re: [PATCH] Support % wildcard in extension upgrade filenames
Previous Message Sébastien Lardière 2023-03-07 17:14:58 Re: Timeline ID hexadecimal format