| From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PGOPTIONS="-fh" make check gets stuck since Postgres 11 |
| Date: | 2019-07-09 18:54:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAAKRu_Z+oeQW2NqqfiCmxv8nq+4MVWFzimJQobZGB-AhQzw68A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 8, 2019 at 12:21 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> The point of regressplans.sh is to see if anything goes seriously
> wrong when forcing non-default plan choices --- seriously wrong being
> defined as crashes or semantically wrong answers. It's not expected
> that the regression tests will automatically pass when you do that,
> because of their dependencies on output row ordering, not to mention
> all the EXPLAINs. I'm not for removing it --- the fact that its
> results require manual evaluation doesn't make it useless.
>
>
It might be worth post-processing results files to ignore row ordering
in some cases to allow for easier comparison. Has this been proposed
in the past?
--
Melanie Plageman
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-07-09 19:01:18 | Re: range_agg |
| Previous Message | Dave Cramer | 2019-07-09 18:32:46 | Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status) |