Re: Count and log pages set all-frozen by vacuum

On Mon, Dec 16, 2024 at 7:14 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 2:18 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > I agree that it will be unimportant from Melanie's work in this area.
> > Also, I agree that if semi-aggressive vacuum has its own new logging
> > message about what it's done, this new message doesn't necessarily
> > need to be detailed. But looking at the proposed patches, there seems
> > to be no such new logging message so far. Showing three categories
> > makes sense to me independent of semi-aggressive vacuum work. If we
> > figure out it's better to merge some parts of this new message to
> > semi-aggressive vacuum's logs, we can adjust them later.
>
> Yes, actually after some review feedback on the eager vacuum patch set
> from Andres, I switched my approach and these counters are no longer a
> dependency. (I still require the second patch in this set).
>
> However, through this discussion, I've come to think that the VM
> logging is useful. As such I plan to commit attached v5 (which
> addresses review feedback and incorporates Tomas' wording suggestion).

I've committed this and marked the commitfest entry as committed as well.

Thanks everyone for your review and input.

- Melanie