| From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: soliciting patches to review |
| Date: | 2024-04-23 17:39:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAAKRu_Yx9hGOeT7TBwgtDpku_iCX5zCQOv-E5fJRxeEaH7avPQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 1:27 PM Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just a quick update. We have so far had 8 suggested patches from 6
> people, if I haven't missed anything. I'm fairly certain that not all
> of those patches are going to be good candidates for this session, so
> it would be great if a few more people wanted to volunteer their
> patches.
Since you are going to share the patches anyway at the workshop, do
you mind giving an example of a patch that is a good fit for the
workshop? Alternatively, you could provide a hypothetical example. I,
of course, have patches that I'd like reviewed. But, I'm unconvinced
any of them would be particularly interesting in a workshop.
- Melanie
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jacob Champion | 2024-04-23 17:39:15 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2024-04-23 17:27:29 | Re: soliciting patches to review |