From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Sergey Dudoladov <sergey(dot)dudoladov(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Introduce "log_connection_stages" setting. |
Date: | 2025-02-28 15:01:23 |
Message-ID: | CAAKRu_YpECdfV-KrwbV7+cR=UfJ9cohJVtpEj-5kLB_6fMCnDQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 5:04 AM Bertrand Drouvot
<bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Did not realized that before but FWIW, it looks "very close" to what Melanie is
> doing in [1] (0001 patch). Idea looks similar excepts, among other things, that
> log_connections is kept.
Oh wow, yes, I never saw this thread. I prefer keeping the original
guc name log_connections. I think it makes sense to also include
disconnected as an option in the list and remove that separate guc
log_disconnections. I was thinking, it should be okay to include "all"
in the list with other values and it just sets the value to all.
- Melanie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Matheus Alcantara | 2025-02-28 15:35:51 | Re: RFC: Additional Directory for Extensions |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-02-28 14:52:24 | Re: moving some code out of explain.c |