Re: read stream on amcheck

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Matheus Alcantara <matheusssilv97(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: read stream on amcheck
Date: 2025-03-27 18:35:44
Message-ID: CAAKRu_YjeGtOK2o-Jra4wWjh+3OtuBT+LQprb6fry0VhUJbzGA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 27, 2025 at 4:45 AM Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> I liked the first approach more. We can solve the first approach's
> problems by introducing a void pointer to pass to
> read_stream_begin_relation(). We can set it to &rsdata.range for the
> SKIP_PAGES_NONE case and &rsdata for the rest.

Cool. I've gone with this approach but have renamed all the functions
and structs to try and be more consistent and clear.
Committed in 043799fa08c2c and I marked the commitfest entry as such.

- Melanie

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matheus Alcantara 2025-03-27 18:45:46 Re: read stream on amcheck
Previous Message Robert Haas 2025-03-27 18:32:27 Re: Remove restrictions in recursive query