From: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nazir Bilal Yavuz <byavuz81(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: BitmapHeapScan streaming read user and prelim refactoring |
Date: | 2024-04-22 17:01:51 |
Message-ID: | CAAKRu_YA2YBQNr+qE_hq-a4ohqDx+dD2wWekzOhmMUmYcJ0Knw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 5:39 AM Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 4/18/24 09:10, Michael Paquier wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 07, 2024 at 10:54:56AM -0400, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> >> I've added an open item [1], because what's one open item when you can
> >> have two? (me)
> >
> > And this is still an open item as of today. What's the plan to move
> > forward here?
>
> AFAIK the plan is to replace the asserts with actually resetting the
> rs_empty_tuples_pending field to 0, as suggested by Melanie a week ago.
> I assume she was busy with the post-freeze AM reworks last week, so this
> was on a back burner.
yep, sorry. Also I took a few days off. I'm just catching up today. I
want to pop in one of Richard or Tomas' examples as a test, since it
seems like it would add some coverage. I will have a patch soon.
- Melanie
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2024-04-22 17:55:08 | Re: subscription/026_stats test is intermittently slow? |
Previous Message | Matthias van de Meent | 2024-04-22 16:46:27 | Re: Cleanup: remove unused fields from nodes |