Re: Making "COPY partitioned_table FROM" faster

From: Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, khuddleston(at)pivotal(dot)io
Subject: Re: Making "COPY partitioned_table FROM" faster
Date: 2018-07-30 04:00:58
Message-ID: CAAKRu_Y1Z1PK9U1_9_OneO8XhYXYPt1+HE6Dqg-dDfwD9VdRbA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 6:00 PM, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:

> Oops. Must've fallen off in transit :) Hopefully, it's more firmly
> attached this time.
>

LGTM. Status changed to "ready for committer"

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jamison, Kirk 2018-07-30 05:22:48 RE: Recovery performance of standby for multiple concurrent truncates on large tables
Previous Message Thomas Munro 2018-07-30 01:38:18 Re: pg_ugprade test failure on data set with column with default value with type bit/varbit