Re: [POC] hash partitioning

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Date: 2017-09-04 10:38:45
Message-ID: CAAJ_b97t2xxij55rfuVGdFM2CvAc_PN515KdV1S8CMBC-eBqrg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I've updated patch to use an extended hash function (​Commit #
81c5e46c490e2426db243eada186995da5bb0ba7) for the partitioning.

Regards,
Amul

On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 5:11 PM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Attaching newer patches rebased against the latest master head. Thanks !
>
> Regards,
> Amul
>

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-Cleanup_v6.patch application/octet-stream 4.0 KB
0002-hash-partitioning_another_design-v17.patch application/octet-stream 83.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message i.kartyshov 2017-09-04 11:04:01 WIP: long transactions on hot standby feedback replica / proof of concept
Previous Message Chris Travers 2017-09-04 10:31:07 Re: Proposal: pg_rewind to skip config files