Re: [POC] hash partitioning

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Date: 2017-09-08 01:15:44
Message-ID: CA+Tgmoa4TKCa6p2176cDt1Zj+MRM=qvHLRnNYaPwe69qLkTcJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 6:38 AM, amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I've updated patch to use an extended hash function (Commit #
> 81c5e46c490e2426db243eada186995da5bb0ba7) for the partitioning.

Committed 0001 after noticing that Jeevan Ladhe also found that change
convenient for default partitioning. I made a few minor cleanups;
hopefully I didn't break anything.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-09-08 01:16:38 Re: Adding support for Default partition in partitioning
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-09-08 01:07:07 Re: Moving relation extension locks out of heavyweight lock manager