From: | Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn(at)amazon(dot)com>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, "andres(at)anarazel(dot)de" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com" <masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, "mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com" <mengjuan(dot)cmj(at)alibaba-inc(dot)com>, "Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com" <Jakub(dot)Wartak(at)tomtom(dot)com>, Ryo Matsumura <matsumura(dot)ryo(at)fujitsu(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: prevent immature WAL streaming |
Date: | 2021-10-07 11:11:37 |
Message-ID: | CAAJ_b97=34F9V99rO1RyGbKaUzyPiefeCWwa8U4pm2E2hZmKwA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 8:14 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
>
> On 2021-Sep-24, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>
> > Here's the set for all branches, which I think are really final, in case
> > somebody wants to play and reproduce their respective problem scenarios.
> > Nathan already confirmed that his reproducer no longer shows a problem,
> > and this version shouldn't affect that.
>
> Pushed. Watching for buildfarm fireworks now.
>
While reading this commit (ff9f111bce24), wondered can't we skip
missingContrecPtr global variable declaration and calculate that from
abortedRecPtr value whenever it needed. IIUC, missingContrecPtr is the
next page to the page that abortedRecPtr contain and that can be
calculated as "abortedRecPtr + (XLOG_BLCKSZ - (abortedRecPtr %
XLOG_BLCKSZ))", thoughts? Please correct me if I'm missing something,
thanks.
Regards,
Amul
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | vignesh C | 2021-10-07 11:19:01 | pg_dump does not dump tables created in information_schema schema |
Previous Message | Etsuro Fujita | 2021-10-07 10:47:44 | Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers, take 2 |