Re: [POC] hash partitioning

From: amul sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [POC] hash partitioning
Date: 2017-09-27 07:05:37
Message-ID: CAAJ_b95we7KgfLWfi8wt77sRkDk2T3HwGqaWYVLq5jdmSUu5aA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:55 PM, Jesper Pedersen <jesper(dot)pedersen(at)redhat(dot)com
> wrote:

> On 09/15/2017 02:30 AM, amul sul wrote:
>
>> Attached rebased patch, thanks.
>>
>>
> While reading through the patch I thought it would be better to keep
> MODULUS and REMAINDER in caps, if CREATE TABLE was in caps too in order to
> highlight that these are "keywords" for hash partition.
>
> Also updated some of the documentation.
>
>
Thanks a lot for the patch, included in the attached version.​

> V20 patch passes make check-world, and my testing (typical 64 partitions,
> and various ATTACH/DETACH scenarios).
>

Nice, ​thanks again.

Regards,
Amul

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-hash-partitioning_another_design-v21.patch application/octet-stream 86.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2017-09-27 07:05:39 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2017-09-27 06:41:25 Re: Transactions involving multiple postgres foreign servers