On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 11:53 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 12:58:29PM +0530, Dilip Kumar wrote:
> > Looks good to me.
>
> Rather than using the term "recovery state", I would just use
> SharedRecoveryState. This leads me to the attached.
Alright, that too looks good. Thank you !
Regards,
Amul