| From: | Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Error-safe user functions |
| Date: | 2022-12-15 06:19:24 |
| Message-ID: | CAAJ_b95Xa=ETvJepoFDfkfRsvemjt6bjYLRxjEs1QkTCP=NT8Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 11:16 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > There are other a bunch of hard errors from get_multirange_io_data(),
> > get_range_io_data() and its subroutine can hit, shouldn't we care
> > about those?
>
> I think those are all "internal" errors, ie not reachable as a
> consequence of bad input data. Do you see a reason to think
> differently?
Make sense, I was worried about the internal errors as well as an
error that the user can cause while declaring multi-range e.g. shell
type, but realized that case gets checked at creating that multi-range
type.
Regards,
Amul
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2022-12-15 06:36:06 | Re: [PATCH] Teach pg_waldump to extract FPIs from the WAL |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2022-12-15 06:12:59 | Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15 (typo) |