Re: Partitioning with temp tables is broken

On Wed, Jun 13, 2018, 8:34 PM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> > [ lots o' problems with $subject ]
>
> > But a larger question is what use such temporary partitions are?
> > Should we just prohibit adding temporary partitions to a permanant
> > partitioned table? We should allow adding temporary partitions to a
> > temporary partitioned table if only they both belong to the same
> > session.
>
> Even if you want to argue that there's a use case for these situations,
> it seems far too late in the release cycle to be trying to fix all these
> issues. I think we need to forbid the problematic cases for now, and
> leave relaxing the prohibition to be treated as a future new feature.
>

+1, forbid the problematic case.

Regards,
Amul
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse brevity and tpyos.

>