| From: | Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature |
| Date: | 2024-12-09 17:29:02 |
| Message-ID: | CAAJ_b949jFC4KkZmgRA5GNV7tHOPJJDqVqBUrck3B+ykAiD_XQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Dec 9, 2024 at 9:40 PM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> hi.
> only applied v7-0001.
>
> alter_table.sgml says we can specify enforceability
> for ALTER TABLE ADD column_constraint
> and ALTER TABLE ADD column_constraint table_constraint.
> but we didn't have a test for column_constraint in alter_table.sql
>
> so segmental fault happened again:
>
This is an assertion failure introduced by the patch to ensure that a
NOT ENFORCED constraint is marked as invalid. The failure occurs
because skip_validation and initially_valid were not set inside
transformConstraintAttrs(). I will post an updated version of the
patch tomorrow after conducting some additional testing. Thanks for
the test.
Regards,
Amul
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2024-12-09 17:48:15 | Re: Assert failure on running a completed portal again |
| Previous Message | Eric Hanson | 2024-12-09 17:27:31 | Re: Proposal: Role Sandboxing for Secure Impersonation |